Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Sarah Palin: Progress or a Step Back?

A little over a year ago, Republican presidential candidate John McCain was keeping the nation guessing when it came to his running mate for Vice-President. Mitt Romney was a name thrown around frequently, as was Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty. Little did we know that the person he was going to pick was about to become one of the biggest butt of countless jokes. When he announced his running mate was going to be the Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, no one knew who she was, and many people thought it was a good idea to have a female stand beside him. Even I, as a Democrat, thought John McCain was making a smart move in his campaign. But before the Republican Party knew what hit them, a backlash was almost instantly formed against Palin, slamming her inexperience and her “Alaskanomics”.

As with Barack Obama, people uncovered many controversial issues with Palin, including her pregnant daughter, who was still a senior in high school when the campaign started, as well as finding out how she was charging the cost of her hair and clothing to the campaign itself. An article I found from Time talked about her Alaskanomics, and her claim of how she was a fiscal conservative. “Back to reality. Of the 50 states, Alaska ranks No. 1 in taxes per resident and No. 1 in spending per resident. Its tax burden per resident is 2 1/2 times the national average; its spending, more than double. The trick is that Alaska's government spends money on its own citizens and taxes the rest of us to pay for it. Although Palin, like McCain, talks about liberating ourselves from dependence on foreign oil, there is no evidence that being dependent on Alaskan oil would be any more pleasant to the pocketbook.” (Michael Kinsley) In addition to that, the article also talked about how Alaska was the number one state in the nation to receive money from Washington, and was number one in federal spending per resident.

More claims that Sarah Palin has made and have been proven false include her allegation that she was against the “Bridge to Nowhere” (a bridge to connect two Alaskan islands, one with an airport).

In reality, she supported it and promoted it within Alaska, and even though the bridge was never built, Alaska kept $230 million dollars in tax payer funds, and $20 million in funds for the bridge. Also from the Time article: “Palin has continued to repeat the already exposed lie that she said "No, thanks" to the famous "bridge to nowhere" (McCain's favorite example of wasteful federal spending). In fact, she said "Yes, please" until the project became a symbol and political albatross.” (Michael Kinsley) Also, she denied association with the Alaska Independence Party (a political party that was established to challenge the legitimacy of Alaska becoming a part of the United States, and it still exists today with the goal of making Alaska into a separate country, so that the state can charge the US market higher prices for its oil), when in truth she had been associated with them for 14 years and her husband, Todd Palin, was a registered AIP member from 1995-2002. Above is a recorded clip of Palin shown at the AIP 2008 convention. All of the recorded and photographic proofs that go against her original claims to get the public’s support continue to hurt her credibility as a politician that the United States can rely on.

Now I can lead into the Double Bind problem, which we learned in class. The definition of the term is “the cultural norms for being a “good” woman are the opposite of those for being a good leader.” Sarah Palin used the fact that she was a mother of five children (the youngest being mentally impaired) as a way to relate to female voters, going on about how she was still a normal hockey mom even though she ran a state. While that tactic worked, it also brought on a whole new aspect to the campaign. Palin, along with John McCain’s wife Cindy, were frequently referred to as MILF’s and became extremely “pornified” (the mainstreaming of narratives, metaphors, images, and frames pulled from the realm of pornography). In addition to that a “pornified” image needs not to be explicit as actual pornography, rather it connotes interpretations that are hyper-sexual, exploitation, and/or masochistic. (Straight out of the lecture!) Many girls I know dressed as Palin or McCain for Halloween, but none of them wore a pantsuit that’s for sure. I mostly saw suit jackets and extremely skimpy bottoms to go with it. You know it’s not just something guys think when females are willingly going along with the image of pornifiying the women who are supposed to run our country, (in contrast, think of what a Hillary Clinton costume would look like? Yikes!) and be an inspiration to fellow women everywhere. Case in point:

How many other Vice-Presidential nominees do you know that have their own porn? Palin was also a beauty queen contestant, competing for Miss Alaska in 1984. Now, let’s just be honest. Sarah Palin definitely played up the fact that she was a former beauty queen, and an attractive female that was running for office. I’m sure the attention she received for her “sexy librarian glasses” and fancy up-do was the last of her worries.

As we all know (at least I hope so), the election came and went, McCain and Palin were defeated by Obama and Biden. While many of us hoped that Sarah Palin’s time in the spotlight was over, she was determined to not let that happen. A few months went by after President Obama’s inauguration, with the whole nation watching and judging him, quickly forgetting about his competitors. But then, WABAM! She was back in July, with her announcement that she was resigning as the Governor of Alaska. Once again, she was back in the news with rumors swirling that her marriage was on the rocks and that was the cause of her stepping down. Many speculated she wanted to ready herself for the 2012 election. It didn’t help that the father of her 17 year old daughter’s child came out swinging by throwing himself into pop culture with interviews about the Palin household. He never really had many nice things to say about her. Take for example his interview with Vanity Fair: "Sarah walked around the house pouting ... one or two weeks after she got back, she started talking about how nice it would be to quit, write a book or do a show and make triple the money.” Well funny enough, Sarah Palin did write a book (actually, someone ghost wrote for her) and the release for Going Rogue: An American Life will be available for all Sarah Palin enthusiasts starting November 17th. She has also started/attempted to lecture to crowds. She signed with the Washington Speakers Bureau, who also represents Condaleeza Rice, George W. Bush, and magician David Blaine, among others. She is rumored to be asking for $100,000 per speech, but unfortunately, no one has been jumping at the chance to book her. According to Page Six, ““The big lecture buyers in the US are paralyzed with fear about booking her, basically because they think she is a blithering idiot."Many big lecture venues are subscription series, "and they don't want to tick people off," said our source. "Palin is polarizing, and some subscribers might cancel if she's on the lineup." Other lecture buyers are universities, which have a leftist slant, and corporations, which dislike controversy.”” Well that doesn’t sound like good news.

While Sarah Palin did accomplish quite a few things none of us would have ever expected (like surprising all of us at the VP debates), it is hard for many people to fully accept her as a prominent political figure. While I’m sure she will always have a reputation as a lipstick wearing pit-bull, I personally hope a pit-bull won’t ever be running our country.


Resources

http://m.nypost.com/ms/p/nyp/nyp/sBJi7rHApNUPe3RtcOrYA_w/view.m?id=23202&storyid=4.0.817918059

http://www.palintruth.org/

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1839724-1,00.html

http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2009/09/levi-johnston-sarah-palin-wanted-bristol-palin-pregnancy-secret/

http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2009/09/sarah-palin-memoir-to-be-released-on-november-17/

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

We're Not Afraid to get Mavericky!

Saturday Night Live is a show that everyone can love and watch. It started in 1975, 15 years before I was born. It is one of my favorite shows on TV right now, and I will admit that I have skipped a few parties once in a while to stay in and watch it. Whether it’s Chris Farley’s infamous “I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!” skit or Andy Samberg and Justin Timberlake singing about an inappropriate Christmas gift, SNL has always been a show that delivers and keeps people laughing.

Now, while I am far too young to understand the impact of Chevy Chase’s impersonation of Gerald Ford I do know that he did mark the series first “landmark” impression of a president. He portrays him as an airheaded (for lack of a better term) clumsy man. His impression was one of the first ones that really made an impact on people, since due mainly to his impersonations, the public viewed Ford generally as a klutz. Ironically, Ford was the first non-cast member and first commander-in-chief to deliver the famous “Live from New York- it’s Saturday night!” Chevy Chase was also the original anchor of Weekend Update, which is a show that many people from my generation do watch and I frequently hear my friends crack jokes that come straight from an Update segment.

Another famous impersonation was Dana Carvey as George H.W. Bush.
Dana Carvey As Bush George H.W. Bush appeared on the show in 1994, the year after he finished in office and Dana Carvey left on SNL. However, the episode he made a cameo in was an episode that Dana Carvey hosted, and even though he was no longer president, the “candidate appeal” can also come into play with that, as if to say even though he was no longer president, he could still laugh along with everyone else.

Last season, the best skits put on by the show were definitely the debates and the ones with the cast members playing the candidates, but it didn’t just start there. As I mentioned above, Dana Carvey was extremely popular as George H.W. Bush, and one of the earlier debates I found was with Carvey as Bush and Jon Lovitz as Michael Dukakis. Strangely enough, one of Jon’s lines is “I can’t believe I’m losing to this guy.” Well, it’s pretty obvious that he, in fact, did lose to Bush in 1988, another reflection to how SNL does a pretty damn good job at predicting and reflecting the public’s opinion of candidates. Another favorite of mine is Will Ferrell as George W. Bush and Darrell Hammond as Al Gore. The portrayals of the two are spot on, especially Ferrell. Unlike his father, the 2nd president Bush never personally appeared on the show, which doesn’t really surprise me. I don’t view him as someone that would be able to laugh off the fact that they portray him as just a straight up idiot. Al Gore did come on though, and did poke fun at himself as many others have before him. If you watch the video above you’ll notice how often Hammond refers to a “lockbox” and how it refers to just about everything. Since 2000, Al Gore has actually hosted the show and took a seat on the fake SNL oval office and talked as if he was the president in a “parallel universe”, and yes, the lockbox did come into play in his opening monologue.


- f

Moving onto the present time. The movement to get my demographic to register to vote and actually vote has been huge over the past 20 years, starting primarily with Bill Clinton. When the elections were going on there were constant PSA’s featuring celebrities, MTV’s Rock the Vote, and even a music video with various different artists supporting Barack Obama directed towards 18-25 year olds with their message being that our generation is important, get out there and vote, we can make a difference, etc. Obviously Saturday Night Live wasn’t going to be left behind in the movement, especially with the striking facial similarities with former SNL cast member Tina Fey and Republican Vice President nominee Sarah Palin. Tina Fey’s portrayal of Palin helped the series improve its ratings significantly from the season before and it also led to a media firestorm with people constantly talking about her performances and comparing them to Palin since they were eerily similar. As we watched in class, Sarah Palin came on SNL and threw a reference to Tina Fey with doing her signature sign-off after Weekend Update and there was another segment that we didn’t watch in class. In the segment where Palin is watching Fey portray Palin, Fey is obviously mocking her and poking fun, and when they show Palin, she appears laidback and like the jabs is just rolling off her shoulders. Also appearing is Mark Wahlberg who goes after Andy Samberg who made fun of him on a show, and then Alec Baldwin comes up and insults Sarah Palin to her face, thinking she is Tina Fey. Sarah however, just stands there smiling and then throws an insult back at Baldwin, stating that Stephen is her favorite Baldwin. In reality, she was showing us that she is tough and she can handle the criticism that she was receiving in the press and she can dish it just as much as she can take it.

In addition to Sarah Palin appearing on the show last season, Mike Huckabee appeared mocking himself (we watched that one in class), as well as John McCain. McCain actually did a skit with Tina Fey as Sarah Palin. The skit was a commercial for QVC home shopping network, and they were hawking items such as blank dinner plates (referring to the town hall debates Obama wouldn’t do), “Joe Action Figures” (Joe the plumber, Joe Biden) among others (Cindy McCain also shows up in the skit, where she is showing off items, referring to the whole “MILF” and trophy wife labels she got throughout the campaign). President Obama was also supposed to be a guest and he was in fact booked, but right before the show his grandmother died and was unable to attend.

All of these examples go along with the candidate appeal and homophily aspects we covered in class. Homophily, by the way, is how we like to vote for candidates who are similar to ourselves. Personally, I like to be around people who don’t take themselves too seriously and can laugh at themselves, and I am pretty sure about 90% of the population would agree with me. As we all know, politicians do tend to be pretty smart or their advisors are, and it’s obvious that appearing on SNL would be good for a candidates appeal since it would show viewers that they can laugh at themselves and not take everything so seriously. They can think outside of the debates and campaigning constantly (even though that is actually what they are doing) and relax. They can kick back and take criticism and even laugh along, because we all want a leader who is able to laugh once in a while. While it was extremely cool to see these public figures on SNL, it did seem a bit overplayed, like if you weren’t on the show then you just had a stick up your ass and couldn’t take the criticism.